MY FUTURE INTERVIEW WITH 'TEXAS TALKS' MAGAZINE ABOUT TEXAS OF TODAY

When a weekly or monthly publication called "Texas Talks" gets established in the Lone Star State, I will welcome that opportunity to comment on our state during an interview with that new media company.

The following is the transcript of what I expect will someday be my interview with "Texas Talks" magazine:

TEXAS TALKS: "You talk a lot about Texas's potential greatness. What do you believe is keeping our state from being truly great at present?"

MYSELF: "We could start with our state's unwanted pregnancy crisis, which should be so embarrassing to our state legislators that they all turn beet red with dismay whenever they are asked to publicly speak about this very alarming statewide problem."

TEXAS TALKS: "Have you ever seen a Texas legislator appear embarrassed when he talked about our state's astronomically high unwanted pregnancy rate?

MYSELF: "I myself haven't. But those legislators should all feel personal responsibility for unwanted pregnancies in our state. Our Legislature's failure to address this crisis has made our legislators a lot like the proverbial Texan parents who tell their teenage daughter, 'Have fun with your boyfriend tonight, but remember to protect your virtue'."

TEXAS TALKS: "What is your personal objection to that type of parental advice?"

MYSELF: "It invites the young lady to re-define the word 'virtue' as 'generosity in sharing physical affection with my boyfriend.' And that, in turn, leads to pregnancy out of wedlock."

TEXAS TALKS: "Are you suggesting that every time a teenage female Texan gets pregnant out of wedlock, you believe she should file a lawsuit against the Texas Legislature, alleging that the Legislature played a role in subjecting her to an unwanted pregnancy?"

MYSELF: "That's my view. But I myself have not been aware of a legal precedent of that type that developed from a court of law in this state."

TEXAS TALKS: "Could you elaborate a bit about what makes the unwanted pregnancy rate in our state a crisis?"

MYSELF: "Unwanted pregnancy translates into an unwanted parenting crisis. Let's face it. If you're pregnant out of wedlock and you give birth to a baby, the chances are very high that you won't fully put your heart into raising your unwanted child. And your unwanted child will sense that you don't love him. He's a year-round reminder to you that you made a mistake when you got pregnant to someone you did not want to get pregnant by."

TEXAS TALKS: "What do you believe our state and local governments can do about the unwanted-pregnancy crisis in our state?"

MYSELF: "Personally, I would like to see our Legislature approve a new slogan for our entire state. That slogan would be: 'IF YOU DATE, DON'T DRINK'. Many Texan ladies get pregnant because they drank alcohol during a romantic date with a young man, and later that night they went further with their male dating partner than they had planned on.

"If all the single ladies of our entire state would develop a lifestyle practice of never drinking alcohol during or shortly before ANY of their romantic dates, this would cause the unwanted pregnancy rate to fall dramatically."

TEXAS TALKS: "That would sure be nice, if the percentage of all pregnancies occurring in this state that are planned and truly wanted, could increase dramatically. I would think that we'd see a lot more Texans who are happy about their lives.

MYSELF: "That's exactly my hope, too."

TEXAS TALKS: "And what about your position on noise pollution in our state? I raise this question because some of my colleagues at my 'Texas Talks' magazine office tell me that this is a major issue for you."

MYSELF: "I'm very hopeful that our Texas Legislature in the session that begins January 2011 will approve a new law that makes the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality state agency in Austin legally responsible for helping to terminate unwanted continuous year-round noise pollution anyplace in Texas----even in our capital city of Austin---that has been determined to be medically harmful to any resident of Texas."

TEXAS TALKS: "Are you saying that the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality currently does not have any legal authority to enforce federal or state laws relating to noise pollution?"

MYSELF: "This is what the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) has repeatedly claimed in reply letters to myself in recent years. Whenever I've written to the TCEQ state agency about continuous year-round, multi-year noise pollution in Austin, Texas, that a first-rate ear, nose, and throat medical specialist, Dr. David Tobey of Austin, has determined to be significantly injurious to myself, the TCEQ has told me in writing that it's strictly up to the City Government of Austin in Austin, Texas, to enforce the laws on that."

TEXAS TALKS: "Sounds like some rather sly buck-passing by a state agency of Texas."

MYSELF: "That's exactly my conclusion about it, too. Let's not forget that the name of this state agency is the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Enjoying full freedom from injurious noise pollution should be a very important aspect of environmental quality for all Texans, including myself."

TEXAS TALKS: "Do you ultimately blame the Texas Legislature for unwanted noise pollution in Austin, Texas, that has permanently damaged your own hearing capacity, according to the first-rate ear, nose, and throat specialist who has reportedly examined your hearing capacity inside his medical clinic on numerous occasions since 2005."

MYSELF: "Yes, I do blame the Texas Legislature. Those legislators' failure over a multi-decade period to protect my and other law-abiding Texans' freedom from medically-injurious and constant year-round noise pollution that I and those other law-abiding Texans did not request or authorize or generate or cause, is truly outrageous."

TEXAS TALKS: "I get the impression that you possibly plan to file a multi-billion dollar lawsuit against the Texas Legislature governing body of the State Government of Texas."

MYSELF: "Thank you for your very kind empathy about this legal-liability matter currently facing the Texas Legislature governing body in Austin, Texas. I will of course welcome that opportunity, in a very civil and law-abiding manner, to make the Texas Legislature fully accountable in a court of law for that governing body's unconscionable failure to protect my own hearing capacity as a law-abiding, gainfully employed, single adult gentleman residing in Austin, Texas."

TEXAS TALKS: "What do you think might have prompted the Texas Legislature governing body to repeatedly fail to uphold your legal right to enjoy full privacy rights in Texas, including during your leisuretime?"

MYSELF: "It seems to me likely that many current members of the Texas Legislature in Austin, Texas, regard noise pollution as a weapon they're willing to secretly 'sponsor' that they regard as a source of surreptitious state-sponsored punishment and attempted censorship of any law-abiding Texan gentleman---myself, for instance---whose political and religious and personal beliefs are comprehensively incompatible with those of all current members of the Texas Legislature. I take great pride in being a politically and religiously Prohibitionist and anti-alcohol, anti-tobacco, anti-gambling, lifelong non-Christian gentleman with strong support for implicit deism. I'm definitely NOT an atheist or agnostic. I'm also someone with a strong devotion to well-bridled capitalism accompanied by full conservation of natural resources and comprehensive environmental protection. I also strongly support honest, law-abiding, non-stalking, civil, clean-talking conduct, and privacy rights for everyone who is not involved in organized crime or observably violent terrorism. I revere the Bill of Rights, including the Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, and Freedom of Strictly-Mutual-Consent Association clauses of the Bill of Rights. I also strongly support law-enforcement, including court-ordered capital punishment for the heinous crime of either homicide or attempted homicide. That combination of political beliefs by myself sets me apart from all of the current state legislators of Texas of whom I'm aware."

TEXAS TALKS: "Are you suggesting that the Texas Legislature has deliberately chosen to be 'deaf' to your own civilly-worded and lawful complaints about medically-injurious noise pollution throughout a multi-decade period in which that very same governing body in Austin, Texas, has secretly and allegedly conspired to make you yourself 'go deaf', as it were, in medically verifiable terms inside this capital city of Texas?"

MYSELF: "It's a classic case of projection on the part of our state legislators here in Austin, Texas. After they learned that I was at risk of 'going deaf' because of medically injurious noise pollution that the Texas Legislature governing body chose to permit over a multi-decade period of my life in Texas ever since 1987, the very same legislators in Austin have been pretending that they themselves are 'deaf' to my own complaints. Their appalling deafness to my complaints to state legislators over a multi-decade period of my own life, is just adding to the amount of my inevitable multi-billion dollar lawsuit against the Texas Legislature in a court of law in Austin, Texas."

TEXAS TALKS: "Have you considered the possibility that these Texas legislators in Austin, Texas, have somehow sponsored an illegal thought-control or illegal brainwashing attempt inflicted on yourself, partly because those state lawmakers disliked your own political and religious ideology?"

MYSELF: "I am very sure that the Texas Legislature governing body of the State Government of Texas in Austin, Texas, has been guilty of very repressive censoriousness toward myself. They've identified themselves as being contemptuous of my own Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, and Freedom of Strictly-Mutual-Consent Association legal rights."