Legal Precedents for Victims of Anonymous Communications

One of my most fervent hopes is that a factually-reliable website on the Internet will soon be established that cites and describes legal precedents that have been established, and government actions that have occurred, on behalf of protecting the legal right of law-abiding Americans to enjoy full freedom from unwanted anonymous communications.

The proposed new website on the Internet might, among other things, note lawsuits that have been filed against the alleged perpetrators of, and alleged financiers of, anonymous communications to which an American citizen or foreign visitor to the United States was subjected against his wishes.

As a law-abiding, non-stalking, and consistently honest single adult American citizen who myself diligently abstains from any participation in anonymous communications of any type with anyone else, I take great pride in accurately citing my full legal name in this Internet blog, for instance. That personal accountability, I might add, is crucial in a truly benevolent democratic nation where individuals speak with sincerity and moral courage and a devotion to the truth.

Anonymous communications, by contrast, are often accompanied by stalking and other criminal intent, contempt for the Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion rights of others, sinister slyness, injurious malice, prevarication, and fraud.

Anonymous communications not directly authorized by the individual being subjected to them are intrinsically injurious, and comprise a pervasive indictment of the institution or group of individuals or individual sponsoring them. This is so regardless of whether that institution is a government-owned entity, a religious group, an atheist group, a political group, a so-called "educational" institution, a media company, or a business entity of any type, and regardless of whether the sponsoring group of individuals or sponsoring individual is reportedly "admired by many" or "respected by many" or "liked by many" or "someone with lots of power and prestige and socioeconomic status," etc.