CITY AUDITOR EXPLAINS IN JUNE 7, 2016, REPLY LETTER TO A PRIVATE CITIZEN, FREQUENT CRIMINAL-LAW COMPLAINANT, AND SELF-IDENTIFIED CONTINUOUS-AND-CONTINUING-DAILY-AND-YEAR-ROUND-AND-MULTI-YEAR-PERSONAL-INJURY-CRIMES-AND-ANAL-RAPE-CRIMES VICTIM, JOHN KEVIN McMILLAN OF AUSTIN, THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY OF AUSTIN---STATE BAR OF TEXAS MEMBER ATTORNEY ANNE MORGAN CURRENTLY HOLDING THAT VERY INFLUENTIAL POSITION OF LEADERSHIP FOR THE CITY---HAS THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO DESIGNATE AN 'APPROPRIATE PARTY' OTHER THAN THE CITY AUDITOR TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE STATE PENAL CODE BY A CITY OF AUSTIN POLICE OFFICER OR APD EMPLOYEE OR APD OFFICIAL

(From:) auditor (at official E-mail address of "oca_auditor@austintexas.gov")

To mcmillanj@att.net (personal E-mail address for John Kevin McMillan of Austin, Texas)

Today (Tuesday, June 7, 2016) at 4:43 PM

Mr. McMillan,

Our office has jurisdiction over fraud, waste, and abuse, however if it is a criminal allegation it would be referred to the appropriate party that the City Attorney would determine.

Olga

From: John Kevin McMillan [mailto:apache@austintexas.gov]

Sent: Saturday, June 4, 2016 10:05 PM

To: auditor

Cc: mcmillanj@att.net

Subject: urgent question for City Auditor

This message is from John Kevin McMillan. [ mcmillanj@att.net ]

Dear City Auditor's Office Staff Members,

Does your office of the City Government of Austin have the legal authority in a cited context to investigate a reported case of alleged fraud or alleged possible obstruction of justice or alleged possible bribery involving one or more officers or employees or officials of the Austin Police Department?